Wednesday, 15 February 2017

evening grosbeaks part 2 The stats

male and female evening grosbeaks 


Well as promised I wanted to look at the stats of evening grosbeak numbers  to try and put our banding season into perspective. When I looked back at the Ontario bird banding journals I only had journals dating back about 12 years which lead to to suggest that the marsh was having a provincial record breaking year.  Fortunately I was able to send send out a request to other Ontario banders  and one of them sent me the historical numbers of evening grosbeaks  banded since 1960.  The first thing I would point out in my defense is that the  numbers show that if you go back to 2002 until present day the maximum number of grosbeaks banded  was 115 which made us feel that we were in great shape. We are currently sitting at 141 grosbeaks banded as of March 13th. I felt that we were making a contribution to helping understand what is happening to grosbeaks moving forward and that the potential for some of these grosbeaks to show up at another banding station or indeed being re-trapped by us in subsequent years would be a worthwhile contribution.  Then I looked at the historical numbers and see that the provincial number of banded grosbeak was  3711 back in 1983.  To put that into perspective the total of banded evening grosbeaks  since 2002 adds up to  823!!!  I cannot imagine  what the size of the flocks must have been for banders to  handle that many birds.  I am headed to the Ontario bird banding  annual conference  at bird studies Canada in Port Rowan  in a couple of weeks and I am looking forward to seeing  some of the banders that were actively catching evening grosbeaks  back when they were so plentiful. The sad news as I mentioned in a previous blog is that there numbers have dwindled to the point that they are now a federal species of concern and perhaps makes the chance to get a band on a bird even more significant for the chance to help track the movements of these boisterous brilliant birds. Try and say that five times fast.  I cannot help but think that the possibility that these birds would be in such low numbers would never have occurred to them when they were banding  so many in the 1980's
     A friend of mine is always pointing out that the last big outbreak of spruce bud worms was in the 1970's and 1980's which perfectly coincides with the the high banding totals that you can look up in the table below . Some may feel that we should not be basing our estimates on populations that were at their peak. This does not however  account for  the fact that grosbeaks are extremely nomadic and will migrate searching either for outbreaks of spruce bud worm or perhaps looking for  feeders with their other favourite food sunflower seeds as feeder watchers will attest to.  One of my concerns about the population dynamics is that is seems unlikely that there should be 50 year  gap between cycles of spruce bud worm outbreaks. Clearly resource management has had an impact on these outbreaks. Perhaps aerial spraying and fire suppression influenced these cycles with a clear impact on the cross Canada population of evening grosbeaks. I for one am glad that they have been listed as a species of concern which will result in a management plan with some suggestion about monitoring  the population moving into the future. I asked Kevin Hannah a Canadian Wildlife Service biologists what he thought about the decrease in population and this is what he sent me. 


"In terms of “normal” levels, I think we’re way below any historic population size. According to the data I’ve seen, based on the Breeding Bird Survey, the Evening Grosbeak population has declined by 86% over the 44 year period from 1970-2014. Much of these declines appear to be from eastern Canada. The most often cited reason for these declines is the control of spruce bud worm and the huge reduction in the size and frequency of outbreaks. Other threats include a loss of habitat due to commercial forestry, mortality from collisions (e.g. windows and cars), and habitat loss/modification due to climate change. As with many species, there’s very little evidence of a direct cause and effect relationship between population changes and these perceived threats, so not exactly a slam dunk in terms of the ultimate causes. There has been, albeit small and localized, a recent increase in spruce bud worm activity in Quebec and parts of Ontario. As a result, there seems to have been some bigger winter “pulses” of this species in the past few years. Perhaps this is a sign of the linkage between this species and bud worms, and signs that populations might be slowly improving. "

      It really is interesting that the last two years we have had our best years for  evening grosbeaks at the marsh and in pockets around the northeast. Again my birder friend mentioned that he saw some flocks of evening grosbeaks in the hundreds one flock potentially near  700 not far from Gowganda. I am curious where the the bud worm outbreaks in Quebec where and how close we are to them. 
      One thing I can say for certain is that  Hilliardton marsh researchers are  excited to have evening grosbeaks this year in the numbers that we do and we will do our best to be part of the research of these beautiful winter finches. The more birds we band the greater the chance for a recovery and adding yet another piece in the puzzle. In addition to the feather isotope study we are helping with I did let the Canadian Wildlife Service know that we have a motus tower  that allows us to track birds fitted with a transmitter so perhaps in the future there are more ways the the hilliardton marsh can help monitor the future health of such spectacular birds. If you have any stories about evening grosbeak numbers historical or otherwise I would love to hear from you. Bird is the word!





Species Number
Species Name
Country or State/Province
Year
Bandings
Count
Encounters
Count
5140
Evening Grosbeak
Ontario
1960
2,379
133
1961
375
110
1962
590
31
1963
195
25
1964
435
27
1965
240
22
1966
344
27
1967
0
5
1968
143
13
1969
170
15
1970
13
16
1971
53
13
1972
306
14
1973
46
11
1974
82
9
1975
1,019
25
1976
297
16
1977
1,647
17
1978
1,515
19
1979
1,921
29
1980
2,175
14
1981
845
11
1982
760
9
1983
3,711
28
1984
909
12
1985
1,916
10
1986
626
1
1987
531
2
1988
486
7
1989
159
2
1990
539
6
1991
199
3
1992
222
2
1993
215
0
1994
296
4
1995
788
2
1996
279
2
1997
173
1
1998
105
1
1999
79
1
2000
149
0
2001
349
0
2002
80
0
2003
108
0
2004
70
0
2005
54
0
2006
25
0
2007
49
1
2008
20
0
2009
2
0
2010
115
0
2011
56
0
2012
96
0
2013
17
0
2014
14
0
2015
33
0
2016
84
0
Totals:
28,104
696

1 comment:

  1. It seems to me that we are basing the current "decline trend" entirely on a benchmark from the late 60's and into the 70's that was established when this species was known to be abnormally abundant. It is also known that population spikes in Evening Grosbeaks are fairly strongly linked to high breeding success at times of extensive Spruce Budworm outbreaks. In a summary fact sheet by Natural Resources Canada on Spruce Budworm (http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/fire-insects-disturbances/top-insects/13383), several comments are very relevant to any discussion of Evening Groskeak numbers. I draw your attention in particular to the following points:

    The last extensive outbreak of spruce budworm in Canada reached its peak in the 1970s, damaging more than 50 million hectares. By the late 1990s, the outbreak had declined to fewer than 1 million hectares.

    Outbreaks of spruce budworm recur at intervals of approximately 35 to 40 years in eastern Canada. Damage is most severe where there are uninterrupted forest stands dominated by mature balsam fir and white spruce.

    New evidence suggests that spruce budworm populations increase first in areas where natural enemies are unable to curtail increases in the local density of budworms. Reproductive success of budworms then increases...leading to a rise in spruce budworm populations over a very wide area.

    Outbreaks end when a combination of reduced resources, resulting from damaged trees, and increases in spruce budworm mortality, caused by many natural enemies, such as birds, parasites and diseases, reduces local budworm survival.

    The spruce budworm outbreak of the 1970's was, by far, the most severe and widespread outbreak of the last 400 years, the entire period for which we have information on spruce budworm outbreaks in Canada (See http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/x83-079). There are a number of likely reasons for this, including human activities in forest management and fire suppression. Nevertheless, it does not make sense to me to be raising loud alarm bells for what is most probably a return to more normal historical numbers for Evening Grosbeaks in Canada. I, for one, am not at all concerned about the population declines in this species since the 1970's, as I believe it represents nothing more than some of the normal fluctuation that is present in all natural systems, both over short term and long term time frames.

    ReplyDelete