male and female evening grosbeaks |
Well as promised I wanted to look at the stats of evening grosbeak numbers to try and put our banding season into perspective. When I looked back at the Ontario bird banding journals I only had journals dating back about 12 years which lead to to suggest that the marsh was having a provincial record breaking year. Fortunately I was able to send send out a request to other Ontario banders and one of them sent me the historical numbers of evening grosbeaks banded since 1960. The first thing I would point out in my defense is that the numbers show that if you go back to 2002 until present day the maximum number of grosbeaks banded was 115 which made us feel that we were in great shape. We are currently sitting at 141 grosbeaks banded as of March 13th. I felt that we were making a contribution to helping understand what is happening to grosbeaks moving forward and that the potential for some of these grosbeaks to show up at another banding station or indeed being re-trapped by us in subsequent years would be a worthwhile contribution. Then I looked at the historical numbers and see that the provincial number of banded grosbeak was 3711 back in 1983. To put that into perspective the total of banded evening grosbeaks since 2002 adds up to 823!!! I cannot imagine what the size of the flocks must have been for banders to handle that many birds. I am headed to the Ontario bird banding annual conference at bird studies Canada in Port Rowan in a couple of weeks and I am looking forward to seeing some of the banders that were actively catching evening grosbeaks back when they were so plentiful. The sad news as I mentioned in a previous blog is that there numbers have dwindled to the point that they are now a federal species of concern and perhaps makes the chance to get a band on a bird even more significant for the chance to help track the movements of these boisterous brilliant birds. Try and say that five times fast. I cannot help but think that the possibility that these birds would be in such low numbers would never have occurred to them when they were banding so many in the 1980's
A friend of mine is always pointing out that the last big outbreak of spruce bud worms was in the 1970's and 1980's which perfectly coincides with the the high banding totals that you can look up in the table below . Some may feel that we should not be basing our estimates on populations that were at their peak. This does not however account for the fact that grosbeaks are extremely nomadic and will migrate searching either for outbreaks of spruce bud worm or perhaps looking for feeders with their other favourite food sunflower seeds as feeder watchers will attest to. One of my concerns about the population dynamics is that is seems unlikely that there should be 50 year gap between cycles of spruce bud worm outbreaks. Clearly resource management has had an impact on these outbreaks. Perhaps aerial spraying and fire suppression influenced these cycles with a clear impact on the cross Canada population of evening grosbeaks. I for one am glad that they have been listed as a species of concern which will result in a management plan with some suggestion about monitoring the population moving into the future. I asked Kevin Hannah a Canadian Wildlife Service biologists what he thought about the decrease in population and this is what he sent me.
A friend of mine is always pointing out that the last big outbreak of spruce bud worms was in the 1970's and 1980's which perfectly coincides with the the high banding totals that you can look up in the table below . Some may feel that we should not be basing our estimates on populations that were at their peak. This does not however account for the fact that grosbeaks are extremely nomadic and will migrate searching either for outbreaks of spruce bud worm or perhaps looking for feeders with their other favourite food sunflower seeds as feeder watchers will attest to. One of my concerns about the population dynamics is that is seems unlikely that there should be 50 year gap between cycles of spruce bud worm outbreaks. Clearly resource management has had an impact on these outbreaks. Perhaps aerial spraying and fire suppression influenced these cycles with a clear impact on the cross Canada population of evening grosbeaks. I for one am glad that they have been listed as a species of concern which will result in a management plan with some suggestion about monitoring the population moving into the future. I asked Kevin Hannah a Canadian Wildlife Service biologists what he thought about the decrease in population and this is what he sent me.
"In terms of “normal” levels, I think we’re way
below any historic population size. According to the data I’ve seen, based on
the Breeding Bird Survey, the Evening Grosbeak population has declined by 86% over the 44
year period from 1970-2014. Much of these declines appear to be from eastern
Canada. The most often cited reason for these declines is the control of spruce
bud worm and the huge reduction in the size and frequency of outbreaks. Other
threats include a loss of habitat due to commercial forestry, mortality from
collisions (e.g. windows and cars), and habitat loss/modification due to
climate change. As with many species, there’s very little evidence of a direct
cause and effect relationship between population changes and these perceived
threats, so not exactly a slam dunk in terms of the ultimate causes. There has
been, albeit small and localized, a recent increase in spruce bud worm activity
in Quebec and parts of Ontario. As a result, there seems to have been some
bigger winter “pulses” of this species in the past few years. Perhaps this is a
sign of the linkage between this species and bud worms, and signs that
populations might be slowly improving. "
It really is interesting that the last two years we have had our best years for evening grosbeaks at the marsh and in pockets around the northeast. Again my birder friend mentioned that he saw some flocks of evening grosbeaks in the hundreds one flock potentially near 700 not far from Gowganda. I am curious where the the bud worm outbreaks in Quebec where and how close we are to them.
One thing I can say for certain is that Hilliardton marsh researchers are excited to have evening grosbeaks this year in the numbers that we do and we will do our best to be part of the research of these beautiful winter finches. The more birds we band the greater the chance for a recovery and adding yet another piece in the puzzle. In addition to the feather isotope study we are helping with I did let the Canadian Wildlife Service know that we have a motus tower that allows us to track birds fitted with a transmitter so perhaps in the future there are more ways the the hilliardton marsh can help monitor the future health of such spectacular birds. If you have any stories about evening grosbeak numbers historical or otherwise I would love to hear from you. Bird is the word!
Species Number
|
Species Name
|
Country or State/Province
|
Year
|
Bandings
Count |
Encounters
Count |
5140
|
Evening Grosbeak
|
Ontario
|
1960
|
2,379
|
133
|
1961
|
375
|
110
|
|||
1962
|
590
|
31
|
|||
1963
|
195
|
25
|
|||
1964
|
435
|
27
|
|||
1965
|
240
|
22
|
|||
1966
|
344
|
27
|
|||
1967
|
0
|
5
|
|||
1968
|
143
|
13
|
|||
1969
|
170
|
15
|
|||
1970
|
13
|
16
|
|||
1971
|
53
|
13
|
|||
1972
|
306
|
14
|
|||
1973
|
46
|
11
|
|||
1974
|
82
|
9
|
|||
1975
|
1,019
|
25
|
|||
1976
|
297
|
16
|
|||
1977
|
1,647
|
17
|
|||
1978
|
1,515
|
19
|
|||
1979
|
1,921
|
29
|
|||
1980
|
2,175
|
14
|
|||
1981
|
845
|
11
|
|||
1982
|
760
|
9
|
|||
1983
|
3,711
|
28
|
|||
1984
|
909
|
12
|
|||
1985
|
1,916
|
10
|
|||
1986
|
626
|
1
|
|||
1987
|
531
|
2
|
|||
1988
|
486
|
7
|
|||
1989
|
159
|
2
|
|||
1990
|
539
|
6
|
|||
1991
|
199
|
3
|
|||
1992
|
222
|
2
|
|||
1993
|
215
|
0
|
|||
1994
|
296
|
4
|
|||
1995
|
788
|
2
|
|||
1996
|
279
|
2
|
|||
1997
|
173
|
1
|
|||
1998
|
105
|
1
|
|||
1999
|
79
|
1
|
|||
2000
|
149
|
0
|
|||
2001
|
349
|
0
|
|||
2002
|
80
|
0
|
|||
2003
|
108
|
0
|
|||
2004
|
70
|
0
|
|||
2005
|
54
|
0
|
|||
2006
|
25
|
0
|
|||
2007
|
49
|
1
|
|||
2008
|
20
|
0
|
|||
2009
|
2
|
0
|
|||
2010
|
115
|
0
|
|||
2011
|
56
|
0
|
|||
2012
|
96
|
0
|
|||
2013
|
17
|
0
|
|||
2014
|
14
|
0
|
|||
2015
|
33
|
0
|
|||
2016
|
84
|
0
|
|||
Totals:
|
28,104
|
696
|
It seems to me that we are basing the current "decline trend" entirely on a benchmark from the late 60's and into the 70's that was established when this species was known to be abnormally abundant. It is also known that population spikes in Evening Grosbeaks are fairly strongly linked to high breeding success at times of extensive Spruce Budworm outbreaks. In a summary fact sheet by Natural Resources Canada on Spruce Budworm (http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/fire-insects-disturbances/top-insects/13383), several comments are very relevant to any discussion of Evening Groskeak numbers. I draw your attention in particular to the following points:
ReplyDeleteThe last extensive outbreak of spruce budworm in Canada reached its peak in the 1970s, damaging more than 50 million hectares. By the late 1990s, the outbreak had declined to fewer than 1 million hectares.
Outbreaks of spruce budworm recur at intervals of approximately 35 to 40 years in eastern Canada. Damage is most severe where there are uninterrupted forest stands dominated by mature balsam fir and white spruce.
New evidence suggests that spruce budworm populations increase first in areas where natural enemies are unable to curtail increases in the local density of budworms. Reproductive success of budworms then increases...leading to a rise in spruce budworm populations over a very wide area.
Outbreaks end when a combination of reduced resources, resulting from damaged trees, and increases in spruce budworm mortality, caused by many natural enemies, such as birds, parasites and diseases, reduces local budworm survival.
The spruce budworm outbreak of the 1970's was, by far, the most severe and widespread outbreak of the last 400 years, the entire period for which we have information on spruce budworm outbreaks in Canada (See http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/x83-079). There are a number of likely reasons for this, including human activities in forest management and fire suppression. Nevertheless, it does not make sense to me to be raising loud alarm bells for what is most probably a return to more normal historical numbers for Evening Grosbeaks in Canada. I, for one, am not at all concerned about the population declines in this species since the 1970's, as I believe it represents nothing more than some of the normal fluctuation that is present in all natural systems, both over short term and long term time frames.